Video Games Suck  
  Create an account
  
Menu
· Home
· Article Archive
· Downloads
· Forums
· Private Messages
· Screenshots
· Search
· Submit a Review
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Your Account
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
Online
248 guest(s) and
0 member(s)

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
VideoGamesSuck.com :: View topic - Finally building a new computer
Login Register Forum FAQ Memberlist Search

VideoGamesSuck.com Forum Index -> General Banter/Flaming -> Finally building a new computer Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Post new topic  Reply to topic
PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:43 pm Reply with quote
berzerker
A Winner is me!
A Winner is me!
 
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350




And so are the PSUs, so it is unlikely your old PSU's will be of any use. Therefore it is often not such a bad thing to buy a system off the shelf and simply replace it completely after a while rather than upgrade it.

PCs are becoming more like consoles in this respect (laptops already were).
View users profile Send private message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:49 pm Reply with quote
puk
A Winner is me!
A Winner is me!
 
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK




berzerker wrote:
It is often not such a bad thing to buy a system off the shelf and simply replace it completely after a while rather than upgrade it.

PCs are becoming more like consoles in this respect (laptops already were).


This is so much waste! The only things that can be reused, like keyboards, are the very things that always come coupled with new computers. Fuck even speakers become obsolete as the standards change.
View users profile Send private message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:56 pm Reply with quote
Pogma9
A Winner is me!
A Winner is me!
 
Joined: Nov 19, 2008
Posts: 2522




U don't want to be salvaging shit anyway as the new stuff is faster, quieter more energy efficient.....certainly not on your primary PC.

If we just focus on my PC box, I spent maybe $1500 or so nearly 2.5 yrs ago....$12 a week for a powerful PC....less if I keep it longer and I have no reason to upgrade for the foreseeable future.
View users profile Send private message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 1:27 am Reply with quote
puk
A Winner is me!
A Winner is me!
 
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK




I give up, this budget case was a huge mistake. I'm going to return the two I haven't completely destroyed and get half decent cases.
View users profile Send private message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 4:01 am Reply with quote
puk
A Winner is me!
A Winner is me!
 
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK




Damn it, talk about shooting yourself in the foot. I managed to get everything plugged in (though it still looks like a bomb exploded inside the case) and I installed Windows XP (32 bit) and fired up Crysis. It crashed during the intro movie. I tried again and skipped the intro, and it crashed before "Helena Rosenthal" came on and did her monologue about the dig. I ran it again on lowest resolution/lowest settings and it crashed again, this time Helena managed to get her name out. I think it's the PSU b/c I doubt the CPU is overheated. It's probably the GTX 460 being a whore of a video card. The operating system works fine though. I'll try another video game.
View users profile Send private message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 4:22 am Reply with quote
berzerker
A Winner is me!
A Winner is me!
 
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350




Take a look at the specs of the power supply and see if these match the requirements of the video card, usually the specs of the PSU are on a label on the PSU itself so this should be pretty straightforward. It seems possible that this PSU provides insufficient amps on the 12v rail, like I had with my Antec.
View users profile Send private message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:50 am Reply with quote
puk
A Winner is me!
A Winner is me!
 
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK




berzerker wrote:
Take a look at the specs of the power supply and see if these match the requirements of the video card, usually the specs of the PSU are on a label on the PSU itself so this should be pretty straightforward. It seems possible that this PSU provides insufficient amps on the 12v rail, like I had with my Antec.


The power supply is so ghetto it doesn't even have a sticker. The case is super ghetto, the screws are all different types, which tells me some chinese guy took whatever was left on the ground and tossed it in there

I just installed FEAR2 --it took an extremely long time too-- and I managed to play through the intro, and then right after that loser says "Nice of you to join us sunshine" it crashed again.

Shitty PSU
View users profile Send private message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:19 pm Reply with quote
puk
A Winner is me!
A Winner is me!
 
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK




I switched to a 500W PSU I had and it seems to be working fine now.

But holy fuck, Crysis is a beast. I had it set to 1900x1200, 16xAA and all High, and in this one scene I had 30 fps (all in Windows XP 32). I changed the config files so everything is technically now on Very High, and the FPS dropped down to 20! If I ran this on Windows 7 I think I would get 15 fps!

But You really understand why this is. FEAR 2 takes so many short cuts. For example the rooms are tiny, and the facial animations are not as good, nor are the fabrics being animated.
View users profile Send private message
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 3:19 pm Reply with quote
puk
A Winner is me!
A Winner is me!
 
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK




I've been testing Crysis on my rig with the following settings

-1900x1200
-16 FSAA
-VSYNC
-Very High Settings (Windows XP hack)
-Windows XP 32 bit

Most of the outdoor levels average 18-22 fps.
Some of the indoor levels can get as high as 30 fps
The ice levels average 14-18 fps
The last level averages 10 fps

I tried overclocking the CPU with no affect. The only other thing I can think of to boost performance is to get the 64 bit Windows XP.

However, this game must be played on the very high settings. The ragdoll effects are so much more fun. I literally just go around grabbing gooks and terrorizing their squad members
View users profile Send private message
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 4:26 pm Reply with quote
berzerker
A Winner is me!
A Winner is me!
 
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350




Why do you need FSAA? AFAIK that eats quite a lot of GPU power.
View users profile Send private message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 5:19 am Reply with quote
_Master_
A Winner is me!
A Winner is me!
 
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711




puk wrote:
I've been testing Crysis on my rig with the following settings

Most of the outdoor levels average 18-22 fps.
Some of the indoor levels can get as high as 30 fps
The ice levels average 14-18 fps
The last level averages 10 fps
icon_cheers.gif very delighted to know

puk wrote:
I tried overclocking the CPU with no affect. The only other thing I can think of to boost performance is to get the 64 bit Windows XP.
oh ya thats right, you should also try to cork your head into a donkeys ass, maybe you could get higher framerates that way on your shitbox

_________________
follow me or get out of the way
View users profile Send private message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 5:27 am Reply with quote
puk
A Winner is me!
A Winner is me!
 
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK




berzerker wrote:
Why do you need FSAA? AFAIK that eats quite a lot of GPU power.


to get rid of jaggies...
View users profile Send private message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:27 am Reply with quote
berzerker
A Winner is me!
A Winner is me!
 
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350




puk wrote:
berzerker wrote:
Why do you need FSAA? AFAIK that eats quite a lot of GPU power.

to get rid of jaggies...

That I know, but is this of any importance at all? Maybe turning it off allows smooth performance on extra high settings.
View users profile Send private message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:55 am Reply with quote
_Master_
A Winner is me!
A Winner is me!
 
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711




berzerker wrote:
puk wrote:
berzerker wrote:
Why do you need FSAA? AFAIK that eats quite a lot of GPU power.

to get rid of jaggies...

That I know, but is this of any importance at all? Maybe turning it off allows smooth performance on extra high settings.
oh my my my what a startling revelation!! i bet nobody knew that!!

_________________
follow me or get out of the way
View users profile Send private message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 12:44 pm Reply with quote
berzerker
A Winner is me!
A Winner is me!
 
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350




_Master_ wrote:
oh my my my what a startling revelation!! i bet nobody knew that!!

I'm sure you didn't, you're welcome. icon_cheers.gif
View users profile Send private message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 2:57 pm Reply with quote
puk
A Winner is me!
A Winner is me!
 
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK




berzerker wrote:
puk wrote:
berzerker wrote:
Why do you need FSAA? AFAIK that eats quite a lot of GPU power.

to get rid of jaggies...

That I know, but is this of any importance at all? Maybe turning it off allows smooth performance on extra high settings.


It will boost performance, but the quality will take a hit
View users profile Send private message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:29 pm Reply with quote
berzerker
A Winner is me!
A Winner is me!
 
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350




puk wrote:
berzerker wrote:
That I know, but is this of any importance at all? Maybe turning it off allows smooth performance on extra high settings.

It will boost performance, but the quality will take a hit

No, you gain quality because it allows you to use higher settings.

And if these jaggies bother you so much (i.e. the increase in quality offered by going from high to ultra high does not compensate sufficiently) then try using a lower AA multiplier, maybe 4X gives you smooth framerates at ultra high. But I'm sure you figured that out yourself, I'm just mentioning this for slightly less knowledgeable beings like the captn, he will read this some day and get a . sign13.gif -moment.
View users profile Send private message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 5:57 pm Reply with quote
_Master_
A Winner is me!
A Winner is me!
 
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711




berzerker wrote:
puk wrote:
berzerker wrote:
That I know, but is this of any importance at all? Maybe turning it off allows smooth performance on extra high settings.

It will boost performance, but the quality will take a hit

No, you gain quality because it allows you to use higher settings.
2 idiots

_________________
follow me or get out of the way
View users profile Send private message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:42 pm Reply with quote
puk
A Winner is me!
A Winner is me!
 
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK




berzerker wrote:
puk wrote:
berzerker wrote:
That I know, but is this of any importance at all? Maybe turning it off allows smooth performance on extra high settings.

It will boost performance, but the quality will take a hit

No, you gain quality because it allows you to use higher settings.

And if these jaggies bother you so much (i.e. the increase in quality offered by going from high to ultra high does not compensate sufficiently) then try using a lower AA multiplier, maybe 4X gives you smooth framerates at ultra high. But I'm sure you figured that out yourself, I'm just mentioning this for slightly less knowledgeable beings like the captn, he will read this some day and get a . sign13.gif -moment.


From my understanding, fullscreen anti aliasing (FSAA) removes jaggies by taking every pixel and testing the values of the pixels around it. If it forms a line then it smooths out this line. Using more pixels around it (2,4,8,16) allows for more accurate algorithms.
View users profile Send private message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:53 pm Reply with quote
berzerker
A Winner is me!
A Winner is me!
 
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350




Full *Scene* Anti Aliasing.

Full-scene anti-aliasing by supersampling usually means that each full frame is rendered at double (2x) or quadruple (4x) the display resolution, and then down-sampled to match the display resolution. So a 2x FSAA would render 4 supersampled pixels for each single pixel of each frame. While rendering at larger resolutions will produce better results, more processor power is needed which can degrade performance and frame rate.

So obviously 16x is much more demanding than 4x, I decided to spell it out for if the captn reads this too.
View users profile Send private message
Finally building a new computer
  VideoGamesSuck.com Forum Index -> General Banter/Flaming
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT - 5 Hours  
Page 5 of 7  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
  
  
 Post new topic  Reply to topic  
Video Games Screenshots Movies Images Reviews News New Video Game Sucks VGS Online
Logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owner. Comments are property of their posters, the rest is ©VGS
Page Generation: 0.108 Seconds