Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
Online
84 guest(s) and 0 member(s)
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
VideoGamesSuck.com :: View topic - Where did my warhammer review go?
I logged in and posted it for you. Suislide is a very busy man. He has a condition that requires him to masturbate to gay midget porn 22 hours per day.
Have patience; if you submit something and it doesn't suck ass it will eventually be posted. Don't be a whiney pussy.
_________________
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 9:44 am
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
Maybe I'm horny all the time b/c I made a mistake trading my g/f in for a PS3, but does anyone else instinctively think "Vaginas" when they read "VGS Admin" Under MOnkey's name?
PS: I'm confident I made the right decision trading her in for a PS3
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 10:13 am
Suislide
VGS Admin
Joined: Aug 14, 2003
Posts: 509
M0nKeY wrote:
I logged in and posted it for you. Suislide is a very busy man. He has a condition that requires him to masturbate to gay midget porn 22 hours per day.
.
Someone's gotta do it
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:29 pm
Suislide
VGS Admin
Joined: Aug 14, 2003
Posts: 509
This forum sucks, it says there is a new post when its my own....
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 4:16 pm
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
it totally sucks, when I ctrl+click a discussion board topic, it opens it in a new tab (in the background), but also opens the link in the current tab...What retard thought of this? what possible purpose does that serve?
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 4:59 pm
Kasrkin
Troll
Joined: Feb 25, 2007
Posts: 193
What about a meta-review of how the present videogame market is absolutely fucked up and spreading it on the internets?
We are under critical situation, if there were a DEFCON system in videogames we would be in the "LAUNCH EVERY FUCKING SHIT TO THE ENEMY" state since a long time.
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:42 pm
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
Kasrkin wrote:
What about a meta-review of how the present videogame market is absolutely fucked up and spreading it on the internets?
We are under critical situation, if there were a DEFCON system in videogames we would be in the "LAUNCH EVERY FUCKING SHIT TO THE ENEMY" state since a long time.
What's a meta review? More to the point? why does it say "flame me" under my name?
I'm assuming you are referring to review sites like Gamespot giving 8's and 9's to games which really deserve 6's. I wouldn't mind doing a review of it, but this is a huge topic and you can't just go swearing the whole way through. It would require a great deal of homework
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 9:36 pm
Kasrkin
Troll
Joined: Feb 25, 2007
Posts: 193
I'm talking about a review that refers to several videogames, points and tendencies as a whole and making final conclusions, rather than just one videogame at a time.
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 5:41 am
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
It's a neat idea, but like I said, it's not an easy task.
To look at the different "tendencies", you'd have to do your homework on several different review sites (lets say gamespot, gametrailers, IGN, 1up.com, and YouGamers.com). It's not hard to cherry pick facts from all of those sources, but to really get a comprehensive view of what they're doing right/wrong would take a few months.
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 8:57 pm
Kasrkin
Troll
Joined: Feb 25, 2007
Posts: 193
There's only a few differences between those review sites (basically the amount of cash they are paid off and by who)
And several users of this forum are tracking the videogame market since 1995-2000 at least, we wouldn't suffer more than if just making one review of a single videogame.
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:18 am
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
well the only review sites I have been tracking are
-Gamespot
-Gametrailers
-1up
-YouGamers
but I'm sure there are hundreds out (billions if you count those fuckin chinese web sites).
A good way to go about it would be to set up sort of a wiki site (on here) and have different people contribute to it. That way, even though no one person has frequented every review site, collectively we would have. Of course wikis only work if you're professional...I don't know how far we would get using the words 'cock' and 'balls' every other sentance.
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 9:59 am
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
Something else just occurred to me, if you read On Bended Knee, it talks about how the Raegan administration tamed the media by giving huge amounts of access to the reporters they liked (in contrast to this under Nixon, the general policy was to talk to the nation directly).
It occoured to me when I was watching an interview with Ubisoft, the girl was asking really tough questions. All Ubisoft has to do is stop doing interviews with GameTrailers, and they'll get the message.
So it's not just about money, it's also about access.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
