Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
Online
427 guest(s) and 0 member(s)
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
VideoGamesSuck.com :: View topic - Who do you think is the most racist?
DUMMY, you haven't begun any sort of critical analysis yet are certain I and millions of other people are wrong, FYI Mr Asshead, US polls generally show favourable results for 911 being an inside job, but I guess all those people are just stupid, but not you, ohhhh noooo, you're the smart one, you know despite KNOWING NOTHING YOU FUCKEN BRAINWASHED ZOMBIE.
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:51 am
Pogma9
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 19, 2008
Posts: 2522
FUCKEN PROBABLY ALL ASSHEADS WHO NEED TO BE CULLED OR PLACED IN CAMPS...FUCK THEM ALL OFF.
RETARDS AND FUCKTARDS IMMEDIATE CULLING.
BRAINWASHED DETAINED IN CAMPS INDEFINITELY.
I GIVE THEM 6-12MONTHS TO LEARN MY TRUTHS OTHERWISE THEIR STATUS CAN BE UPGRADED TO RETARD/FUCKTARD AND CULLED LIKE A FUCKEN KANGAROO.
thx to Dooly Tilly
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 11:04 am
berzerker
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350
Pogma9 wrote:
DUMMY, you haven't begun any sort of critical analysis yet are certain I and millions of other people are wrong, FYI Mr Asshead, US polls generally show favourable results for 911 being an inside job, but I guess all those people are just stupid, but not you, ohhhh noooo, you're the smart one, you know despite KNOWING NOTHING YOU FUCKEN BRAINWASHED ZOMBIE.
THESE POLLS ARE OBVIOUSLY FABRICATED, CAN'T YOU SEE THAT YOU ARE BEING MANIPULATED?
And now you claim to hold the majority viewpoint, that would be a really lousy conspiracy then: only fools like I fall for it, not even Joe Sixpack, who thinks only about chicks, football, entertainment and beer and definitely not about politics (they often don't even take the trouble to vote in elections), buys it. These people must be great minds in disguise! Much like you probably.
Why are you wasting your precious preaching time on a tiny forum like this that no one reads, if you already have the majority on your side, NB in the country that is so utterly dominated by the mass media, which is portaying a very different picture? What does that tell you about their power?
I would suggest to next time at least ATTEMPT to be somewhat coherent.
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:39 am
Pogma9
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 19, 2008
Posts: 2522
YOUR STUPID ASSED "LOGICAL ANALYSIS" WAS FUCKTARD. SO STFU, NO REALLY, FFS, DO IT, STFU
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:42 am
Pogma9
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 19, 2008
Posts: 2522
ALSO FUCKTARD.....THIS FORUM IS CENSORSHIP FREE, WHEREAS MOST OTHER ASSHOLE FORUMS ARE MANNED BY TWATS WHO LOVE PC AND WILL BAN ANYONE WHO DARES QUESTION THE HOLOCOST.
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 10:47 am
berzerker
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350
As discussed before I'm willing to shut up, provided you do too.
This is censorship-free for both of us, so if you are preaching and I do not agree with what you are preaching, expect to be countered, and if you are not taking others' views seriously, expect to be ridiculed in the same way.
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 11:37 am
Pogma9
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 19, 2008
Posts: 2522
THE PROBLEM IS THAT YOUR ANALYSIS IS DEVOID OF PROPER LOGIC YET YOU PRETEND TO HAVE COUNTERED ME.....AS YOU HAVEN'T, I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT YOU IMMEDIATELY STFU.
WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT PHILOSOPHY/LOGIC/SCIENCE/CRITICAL ANALYSIS?...PLEASE NAME SOME OF THE BOOKS THAT YOU'VE READ AND UNDERSTOOD.
I OWN 3 OF AYN RANDS TECHNICAL BOOKS, PLUS SCORES OF OTHER BOOKS ON PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENCE, INCLUDING THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE WHICH ALWAYS INCLUDES HISTORY, EXPLANATION AND CRITIQUE, BUT WHAT ABOUT YOU, WHAT BOOKS ON LOGIC AND THINKING HAVE YOU PROPERLY STUDIED?
BY ALL ACCOUNTS, YOU TYPICALLY READ HISTORY BOOKS, AND IT'S MORE THAN LIKELY THEY'RE PROPAGANDA ANYWAY, SO HOW ARE YOU TRULY KNOWLEDGEABLE WHEN YOU FAVOUR PROPAGANDA AND PRESUMABLY REJECT THE WORK INVOLVED IN PROPER DEEP THINKING?
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 11:44 am
berzerker
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350
Pogma9 wrote:
THE PROBLEM IS THAT YOUR ANALYSIS IS DEVOID OF PROPER LOGIC YET YOU PRETEND TO HAVE COUNTERED ME.....
I was thinking the same about you, and proved it many times already.
Pogma9 wrote:
WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT PHILOSOPHY/LOGIC/SCIENCE/CRITICAL ANALYSIS?...PLEASE NAME SOME OF THE BOOKS THAT YOU'VE READ AND UNDERSTOOD.
I read history books in my spare time, I don't see what's wrong with that. Anyway, it is what I like to do, and doesn't concern you.
I'm interested in science, but it is not my speciality and I don't feel like reading books about it. Anyway, I do not see how reading such books would somehow make me superior, as seems to be the premise underlying your claims.
Pogma9 wrote:
I OWN 3 OF AYN RANDS TECHNICAL BOOKS, PLUS SCORES OF OTHER BOOKS ON PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENCE, INCLUDING THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE WHICH ALWAYS INCLUDES HISTORY, EXPLANATION AND CRITIQUE, BUT WHAT ABOUT YOU, WHAT BOOKS ON LOGIC AND THINKING HAVE YOU PROPERLY STUDIED?
If you need books to understand something about logic you are even more pathetic than I already thought you were.
And look where it brought you. Everyone hates and ridicules you. And that's for defending utterly undefendible claims.
What criteria do you apply for selecting those books anyway? It must be 'rebellious' somehow I suppose. In science you read books from the outcasts of scientific community and then you call it "truths" and "wisdom" and all the others are "devoid of logic".
Pogma9 wrote:
BY ALL ACCOUNTS, YOU TYPICALLY READ HISTORY BOOKS, AND IT'S MORE THAN LIKELY THEY'RE PROPAGANDA ANYWAY, SO HOW ARE YOU TRULY KNOWLEDGEABLE WHEN YOU FAVOUR PROPAGANDA AND PRESUMABLY REJECT THE WORK INVOLVED IN PROPER DEEP THINKING?
I tend to read more than one book about any subject and avoid the propaganda books (no auto-biographies for example, or books written by participants - Churchill being particularly questionable).
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:47 pm
Alez
A Winner is me!
Joined: Apr 09, 2009
Posts: 669
Location: Romania
Pogma9 wrote:
YOUR STUPID ASSED "LOGICAL ANALYSIS" WAS FUCKTARD. SO STFU, NO REALLY, FFS, DO IT, STFU
LOL pigmy knows nothing better to say than "STFU", yet again. This is what he resorts to against a superior opponent, i.e. against anyone.
_________________ Sigs are for n00bs!
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 2:22 am
Pogma
Tard
Joined: Feb 04, 2009
Posts: 80
Location: Brisbane, Australia
STFU ALZE BEELZEBUB!!!!!!!!!!
GTFO OR BACK TO LURKING MODE FOR ANOTHER YEAR FFS!!!
_________________ Real men use a wheel!
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 4:42 am
berzerker
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350
berzerker wrote:
I tend to read more than one book about any subject
For example I'll be reading Illan Pappe's book "ethnic cleansing of Palestine" shortly (puk had recommended it earlier), but that is said to be a bit one-sided (anti-Israel) and focused, so I thought it would be good to read a more generic and objective book about the Israeli war of independence first so I read this one: http://www.amazon.com/1948-History-First-Arab-Israeli-War/dp/0300151128 (Morris - 1948), and this is very good book indeed and should put Pappe's book in proper context.
BTW my copy of the 1948 book has a label "National Jewish Book Awards Winner" but it doesn't seem preoccupied (in pro-jewish) in any respect.
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 10:56 am
Pogma9
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 19, 2008
Posts: 2522
berzerker wrote:
BTW my copy of the 1948 book has a label "National Jewish Book Awards Winner" but it doesn't seem preoccupied (in pro-jewish) in any respect.
LOLOLOL, by what moral criteria are you judging the Palestine/Israeli conflict.....the conflict where one side are a bunch of dirt poor peasants, and the other side a NUCLEAR SUPAPOWER, and not just a military powerhouse in the ME, but the world itself!!
And I'm sure The NJBA are totally impartial, yep, that's gotta be it{FUCKTARD}
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 10:57 am
Pogma9
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 19, 2008
Posts: 2522
Alez wrote:
Pogma9 wrote:
YOUR STUPID ASSED "LOGICAL ANALYSIS" WAS FUCKTARD. SO STFU, NO REALLY, FFS, DO IT, STFU
LOL pigmy knows nothing better to say than "STFU", yet again. This is what he resorts to against a superior opponent, i.e. against anyone.
And what's your background in philosophy/science/history AZZLEBUB AZZHOLE?????????????
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 2:46 pm
berzerker
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350
Pogma9 wrote:
berzerker wrote:
BTW my copy of the 1948 book has a label "National Jewish Book Awards Winner" but it doesn't seem preoccupied (in pro-jewish) in any respect.
LOLOLOL, by what moral criteria are you judging the Palestine/Israeli conflict.....the conflict where one side are a bunch of dirt poor peasants, and the other side a NUCLEAR SUPAPOWER, and not just a military powerhouse in the ME, but the world itself!!
Uh, in 1948 the jewish settlers (later in the war the state of Israel) were the underdogs, Einstein.
Pogma9 wrote:
And I'm sure The NJBA are totally impartial, yep, that's gotta be it
This book definitely is, how can you claim otherwise if you haven't read it?
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 3:38 pm
Pogma9
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 19, 2008
Posts: 2522
berzerker wrote:
Uh, in 1948 the jewish settlers (later in the war the state of Israel) were the underdogs, Einstein.
They weren't the only one's though Gomer Pyle.
Pogma9 wrote:
And I'm sure The NJBA are totally impartial, yep, that's gotta be it
This book definitely is, how can you claim otherwise if you haven't read it?[/quote]
By what moral criteria are you judging conflict?...plus, THX TO YOUR TERMINAL BRAINWASHING, YOU WON'T DISCOVER THE JEWISH INFESTATION OF MEDIA, AS SUCH, YOU'RE FREE TO PLAY DUMB{THOUGH YOU'RE WAY TOO CONVINCING, SO YOU MUST BE A FUCKTARDO}
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 4:03 pm
berzerker
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350
Pogma9 wrote:
berzerker wrote:
Uh, in 1948 the jewish settlers (later in the war the state of Israel) were the underdogs, Einstein.
They weren't the only one's though
This was a conflict between the Arab world on the one hand and the Jewish settlers on the other, and the question who was the underdog, so in this conflict there could, by defnition, only be one: the one that I mentioned.
Pogma9 wrote:
By what moral criteria are you judging conflict?
Who talks about judging? I was saying that the book seems to describe the conflict as unbiased as possible. This has nothing to do with judging or moral criteria.
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 9:16 pm
FUCK_YOU_ALL
A Winner is me!
Joined: Feb 02, 2009
Posts: 630
Location: Why so serious? Seriously, why? It doesn't make sense.
I bet you berzerker is the cloning machine. Hes mister clone-o-matic. He made Alez
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 2:11 am
berzerker
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350
FUCK_YOU_ALL wrote:
I bet you berzerker is the cloning machine. Hes mister clone-o-matic. He made Alez
So I created Alez back in 2009, gave his password away for anyone to grab later, only to reclaim it once no one took it? Doesn't seem all to likely. But I cannot prove that it is wrong obviously. It's a pity that Alez was created shortly after, instead of before, this thread: if it was created just a little bit earlier then that would have proved that I didn't create Alez, because then Alez would have been exposed as a clone too.
I don't think that Alez was created as a clone. He even submitted reviews here at the time, why would I not have done so in my own name?
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:21 am
Pogma9
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 19, 2008
Posts: 2522
FUCK_YOU_ALL wrote:
I bet you berzerker is the cloning machine. Hes mister clone-o-matic. He made Alez
Not sure but BEELZEBUB MUST BE DESTROYED, OR JAILED AND SUBJECT TO WATER BOARDING AND RECTUM "ENTERTAINMENT" BY THE BIG HAIRY BLACK JAILORS.
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:22 am
Pogma9
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 19, 2008
Posts: 2522
berzerker wrote:
Pogma9 wrote:
By what moral criteria are you judging conflict?
Who talks about judging? I was saying that the book seems to describe the conflict as unbiased as possible. This has nothing to do with judging or moral criteria.
Regardless, HOW DO YOU JUDGE A CONFLICT, CAN YOU ANSWER THE QUESTION?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 8 of 11Goto page Previous1, 2, 3 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Next
