Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
Online
164 guest(s) and 0 member(s)
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
VideoGamesSuck.com :: View topic - belgian burka ban
What's with the cock references? Were you raped as a child? By an Islamic extremist?
anecdotal (1)
_________________ follow me or get out of the way
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:33 pm
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
_Master_ wrote:
puk wrote:
You taking one story/article/event/aspect/occurrence/what-the-fuck-ever about one case and applying it to every case is anecdotal.
if that is the case then what you are implying is one should have to divide every number by 10 to find out if it is a multiple of 10, which is dumb but not surprising coming from you. i am gonna do the smart thing, look at the last digit and see if it is a zero and call out my verdict.
Getting back
-> Are burkas a security problem?
=> hail yeah!
-> Is that an anecdotal conclusion ?
=> not from a security viewpoint because it takes only one to do damage
->so what should we do?
=> instant ban/imprisonment/exorbitant fines
->but we like to express burka, how can we express that?
=> by promoting anal burka and burka blowjobs one can spread this glorious cultural expression
You went full retard at the end, but I will address the first paragraph. In my example, it's anecdotal b/c what holds for one case does not hold for the other cases. In your example, it's induction which holds for numbers b/c of their simple air tight nature.
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:34 pm
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
_Master_ wrote:
puk wrote:
What's with the cock references? Were you raped as a child? By an Islamic extremist?
anecdotal (1)
That's a question. That's not even a statement.
At this rate you might as well accuse your Count Chocula of being anecdotal.
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:37 pm
_Master_
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711
puk wrote:
You went full retard at the end,
pls feel free to pass on the message to your community
puk wrote:
but I will address the first paragraph. In my example, it's anecdotal b/c what holds for one case does not hold for the other cases. In your example, it's induction which holds for numbers b/c of their simple air tight nature.
again your stupid. it only takes one burka-bomber to cause damage, so there is no need to analyze each case, it will remain a security thread, just like the same way i don't have to divide each number by 10 to realize weather or not it will be a multiple.
_________________ follow me or get out of the way
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:38 pm
_Master_
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711
puk wrote:
_Master_ wrote:
puk wrote:
What's with the cock references? Were you raped as a child? By an Islamic extremist?
anecdotal (1)
That's a question. That's not even a statement.
but your assumptions behind those questions are anecdotal
_________________ follow me or get out of the way
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:40 pm
_Master_
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711
puk wrote:
At this rate you might as well accuse your Count Chocula of being anecdotal.
this is also sadly anecdotal
_________________ follow me or get out of the way
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:43 pm
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
_Master_ wrote:
again your stupid. it only takes one burka-bomber to cause damage, so there is no need to analyze each case, it will remain a security thread, just like the same way i don't have to divide each number by 10 to realize weather or not it will be a multiple.
That logic is completely flawed. In the first example it is an assumption, whereas in the second case, it is a mathematical theory proved using induction.
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:46 pm
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
_Master_ wrote:
puk wrote:
_Master_ wrote:
puk wrote:
What's with the cock references? Were you raped as a child? By an Islamic extremist?
anecdotal (1)
That's a question. That's not even a statement.
but your assumptions behind those questions are anecdotal
It's not untrustworthy, it's from the horses mouth.
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:48 pm
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
_Master_ wrote:
puk wrote:
At this rate you might as well accuse your Count Chocula of being anecdotal.
this is also sadly anecdotal
Do you actually believe that is anecdotal? Are you telling me after all of that, you still don't understand what it means and when to use it?
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:48 pm
_Master_
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711
puk wrote:
_Master_ wrote:
again your stupid. it only takes one burka-bomber to cause damage, so there is no need to analyze each case, it will remain a security thread, just like the same way i don't have to divide each number by 10 to realize weather or not it will be a multiple.
That logic is completely flawed. In the first example it is an assumption, whereas in the second case, it is a mathematical theory proved using induction.
i disagree, for example on international flights you are banned from taking sharp objects like knifes/scissors/metal/pressured objects as cabin baggage because they are a security hazard. now each and every person who carries those items may or may nor have the motive for exploitation. But in the eyes of the security officer they are all threats. likewise it is the same way for burkas and my 10s multiples example is also perfect if you wherent so anally retentive getting lost in the details each time.
_________________ follow me or get out of the way
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:52 pm
_Master_
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711
puk wrote:
_Master_ wrote:
puk wrote:
At this rate you might as well accuse your Count Chocula of being anecdotal.
this is also sadly anecdotal
Do you actually believe that is anecdotal? Are you telling me after all of that, you still don't understand what it means and when to use it?
i think you dont underand how to read and write. first you need to goback to school, oh wait! you are in school
(1) Evidence in the form of an anecdote or hearsay is called anecdotal if there is doubt about its veracity; the evidence itself is considered untrustworthy.
"At this rate you might as well accuse your Count Chocula of being anecdotal" and why would i want to do that? i dont have a benefactor Count Chocula. therefore your stmt is untrustworthy and hence it is anecdotal.
_________________ follow me or get out of the way
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:01 pm
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
_Master_ wrote:
I disagree, for example on international flights you are banned from taking sharp objects like knifes/scissors/metal/pressured objects as cabin baggage because they are a security hazard. now each and every person who carries those items may or may nor have the motive for exploitation. But in the eyes of the security officer they are all threats. likewise it is the same way for burkas and my 10s multiples example is also perfect if you wherent so anally retentive getting lost in the details each time.
They are different arguments though. Dangerous items are not allowed on a plane because the danger they pose to public security outweighs private freedoms. Your burka example claims that all burkas must be banned b/c they might pose a threat to security. The base ten integer division example is a form of mathematical induction.
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:08 pm
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
_Master_ wrote:
puk wrote:
At this rate you might as well accuse your Count Chocula of being anecdotal.
(1) Evidence in the form of an anecdote or hearsay is called anecdotal if there is doubt about its veracity; the evidence itself is considered untrustworthy.
LOL you are taking parts of (2)
You are assuming that I am taking one case of you being anecdotal and applying it all cases of you being anecdotal
and taking parts of (1)
you are claiming that my initial case (evidence) against you is untrustworthy.
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:10 pm
_Master_
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711
puk wrote:
_Master_ wrote:
I disagree, for example on international flights you are banned from taking sharp objects like knifes/scissors/metal/pressured objects as cabin baggage because they are a security hazard. now each and every person who carries those items may or may nor have the motive for exploitation. But in the eyes of the security officer they are all threats. likewise it is the same way for burkas and my 10s multiples example is also perfect if you wherent so anally retentive getting lost in the details each time.
They are different arguments though. Dangerous items are not allowed on a plane because the danger they pose to public security outweighs private freedoms. Your burka example claims that all burkas must be banned b/c they might pose a threat to security. The base ten integer division example is a form of mathematical induction.
earth to junk can you hear me? earth to junk?....i think i am loosing you.
The arguments discuss security, burkas and sharp objects can be classified as a security hazard.
puk wrote:
The base ten integer division example is a form of mathematical induction.
Again you just cant hep being anally retentive all the time can you? constantly getting into the irrelevant details and loosing sight of the main topic
i have a question for you
do you consider the burka to be a security threat?
_________________ follow me or get out of the way
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:11 pm
_Master_
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711
puk wrote:
_Master_ wrote:
puk wrote:
At this rate you might as well accuse your Count Chocula of being anecdotal.
(1) Evidence in the form of an anecdote or hearsay is called anecdotal if there is doubt about its veracity; the evidence itself is considered untrustworthy.
LOL you are taking parts of (2)
You are assuming that I am taking one case of you being anecdotal and applying it all cases of you being anecdotal
and taking parts of (1)
you are claiming that my initial case (evidence) against you is untrustworthy.
your a lunatic
_________________ follow me or get out of the way
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:31 am
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
_Master_ wrote:
i have a question for you
do you consider the burka to be a security threat?
Of course not, only an irrational person would consider an item of clothing a security threat. A tunic, for example is not a security threat.
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:32 am
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
_Master_ wrote:
your a lunatic
You're calling for the destruction for a whole group of people and I'm the lunatic?
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:38 am
Dick_In_Your_Ass
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
Posts: 957
Location: iCarly Studio
_Master_ wrote:
puk wrote:
_Master_ wrote:
puk wrote:
At this rate you might as well accuse your Count Chocula of being anecdotal.
(1) Evidence in the form of an anecdote or hearsay is called anecdotal if there is doubt about its veracity; the evidence itself is considered untrustworthy.
LOL you are taking parts of (2)
You are assuming that I am taking one case of you being anecdotal and applying it all cases of you being anecdotal
and taking parts of (1)
you are claiming that my initial case (evidence) against you is untrustworthy.
your a lunatic
LOL icwutudidthere
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:25 pm
Alez
A Winner is me!
Joined: Apr 09, 2009
Posts: 669
Location: Romania
Dick_In_Your_Ass wrote:
LOL icwutudidthere
You are beginning to resemble FUCK YOU ALL / TOO / BOTH in the sense that you are not making any sense.
_________________ Sigs are for n00bs!
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:06 pm
Dick_In_Your_Ass
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
Posts: 957
Location: iCarly Studio
I find it funny,master calls puk lunatic,whereas puk 1st called him lunatic;a few islam topics ago.master was prolly tired of labeling him a retard;also I lol due to this being a 'tactic of the captn'.
FUCK IT.BURLAP
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 4 of 7Goto page Previous1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Next
