Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
Online
66 guest(s) and 0 member(s)
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
there you go sukin his cock again, waste of humanity
Yeah, this is more like the Master we know, not that quasi intellectual stuff ripped from somewhere and dumped here.
_________________ Sigs are for n00bs!
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:24 pm
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
Can we make this page a sticky?
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:53 pm
Dick_In_Your_Ass
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
Posts: 957
Location: iCarly Studio
_Master_ wrote:
Dr_Shrink wrote:
It is a pity though, the only place where you were still taken somewhat seriously is finally abandoning you, this must be a severe blow. First the real ban, but you fought back, now the social ban, that's even worse. Even your clones are rejected immediately after their creation!
I'm sure berzerker and puk and the others would be more understanding if they knew more about your troubled youth and abuse and such, but let's not dwell upon that at this stage.
All I can say now is: somewhere in the universe there must be someone who loves you, I cannot imagine anyone who would be so stupid though, but you might find someone in your own social class. If not, your mother must have loved you once, try to make it up with her!
I have facts for those who think and arguments for those who reason. It isn't important whether you agree with every detail that I intend to present. What matters is that you begin to realize that Dr Shrunk used to maintain that he acts in the name of equality and social justice. When he realized that no one was falling for that claptrap, he changed his tune to say that he's renowned for his racial and cultural sensitivity. Shrunk is unquestionably an incorrigible liar, and shame on anyone who believes him.
To borrow the immortal words of a certain, well-known authority figure, "Mendacious Machiavellians, motivated by either paternalism or a desire to lead a bookish, hostile life, are eager to help Shrunk work both sides of the political fence." I am skeptical of efforts to produce a hotheaded definition of "teleoroentgenography", the point being that it takes more than a mass of self-righteous scapegraces to communicate and teach. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to bring important information about Shrunk's xenophobic, soulless circulars into the limelight. He can blame me for the influx of unregenerate, asinine purveyors of malice and hatred if it makes him feel better but it won't help his cause any. Shrunk, as usual, you prove yourself to be pernicious. Here, too, we can see how those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Of course, if Shrunk had learned anything from history, he'd know that one of the bewildering paradoxes of our time is the extent to which he is willing to humiliate, subjugate, and eventually eliminate everyone who wants to protect the interests of the general public against the greed and unreason of bloodthirsty four-flushers, especially given that he himself would be affected by such actions.
The last time I heard Shrunk ramble on in his characteristically bibulous blather he said something about wanting to reduce meaningful political discussions to "my team versus your team" identity-based politics. I feel sorry for the human race when I hear stuff like that. Brown-nosing lexiphanicism is a disgrace to humanity but it cannot be eliminated by moral lectures or by pious intentions. No, it can be eradicated only if we call your attention to the problem of egocentric backstabbers. Ironically, it is not news that while I cannot judge his heart, Shrunk's actions honestly appear fastidious. What speaks volumes, though, is that he demands obeisance from his spin doctors. Then, once they prove their loyalty, Shrunk forces them to disguise the complexity of color, the brutality of class, and the importance of religion and sexual identity in the construction and practice of egotism.
ya shrink has taken a different tone
Almost hypocritical if you must.not sure what you mean in the last part with the whole sexual thing.
Master do you personally know shrink?
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:54 pm
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
You actually read all that ?!?!?
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:42 pm
_Master_
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711
Alez wrote:
not that quasi intellectual stuff ripped from somewhere and dumped here.
somewhere like where?
_________________ follow me or get out of the way
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:43 pm
_Master_
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711
puk wrote:
Can we make this page a sticky?
your ass is sticky, your mouth is sticky and your brain is sticky, thanks to Dr Shrink you stick insect.
_________________ follow me or get out of the way
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:43 pm
_Master_
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711
puk wrote:
You actually read all that ?!?!?
some people read, some people puke.
_________________ follow me or get out of the way
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:05 pm
Alez
A Winner is me!
Joined: Apr 09, 2009
Posts: 669
Location: Romania
_Master_ wrote:
Alez wrote:
not that quasi intellectual stuff ripped from somewhere and dumped here.
somewhere like where?
Why would I care, some random text generator of course, I don't ever use these so I couldn't tell which.
_________________ Sigs are for n00bs!
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:16 pm
_Master_
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711
Alez wrote:
_Master_ wrote:
Alez wrote:
not that quasi intellectual stuff ripped from somewhere and dumped here.
somewhere like where?
Why would I care
paradox
Alez wrote:
some random text generator of course, I don't ever use these so I couldn't tell which.
never heard of them.
_________________ follow me or get out of the way
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:26 pm
_Master_
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711
....right so if i said the topic got a bit side tracked it would be an understatement. so getting back i was wondering if Faisal Shahzad is related to puk?
his Islamic activity has caused him a nice extended vacation in the pen. i am sure his Islamic ass will be exploited there. what do you say puk? do you FEEL for him?
_________________ follow me or get out of the way
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:35 am
berzerker
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350
_Master_ wrote:
nice extended vacation in the pen. i am sure his Islamic ass will be exploited there
You sound like you approve of this. I would think that if a state uses his power to take someone into its custody (i.e. lock him up), it has the obligation to protect that person from crimes, treat him when he is ill, etc, irrespective who he is and what he has done to deserve being locked up. If it systematically fails to do this, it is a barbaric state in my book.
You seem to regard rape an additional penalty. If that assumption is correct, you are no better than these islamic fundamentalists.
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:57 am
_Master_
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711
berzerker wrote:
_Master_ wrote:
nice extended vacation in the pen. i am sure his Islamic ass will be exploited there
You sound like you approve of this.
your catching up quite fast i say
berzerker wrote:
I would think that if a state uses his power to take someone into its custody (i.e. lock him up), it has the obligation to protect that person, irrespective who he is and what he has done to deserve being locked up.
thanks for your expert opinion. are you running the state btw?
berzerker wrote:
Or is rape being regarded an additional penalty in the US legal system? You seem to regard it that way
i think it comes with the package.
berzerker wrote:
in which case I submit you are nothing better than these islamic fundamentalists.
well lets take a look at whats horribly wrong with this stmt of yours and your retarded line of thinking.
[A]activities taken by islamic militants
1. to blow up innocent people in the name of religion
2. to ill treat women in the name of religion
3. to migrate in other countries and to spread their diseased ideology for islamic state conversion
4. to oppose development of human thought and culture in a wide range of activities
[B]activities taken by people who oppose Islamic militants
=> to swiftly reward such people under the harshest penalty as possible
And is [A] = [B] ? i think not unless one or more of the conditions apply
1. you are under the influence of some hallucinogen
2. you are too retarded too make any kind of rational judgment
3. you are from a different universe where time runs backwards rapidly
4. you are a person who goes by the avatar berzerker/Dr.Shrink
5. you are a person who goes by the avatar puk
6. you are a in fact a silly & stupid person
_________________ follow me or get out of the way
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:21 am
berzerker
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350
_Master_ wrote:
berzerker wrote:
I would think that if a state uses his power to take someone into its custody (i.e. lock him up), it has the obligation to protect that person, irrespective who he is and what he has done to deserve being locked up.
thanks for your expert opinion. are you running the state btw?
If you disagree with such a fundamental basic notion I have nothing to say to you.
I would think that if a state uses his power to take someone into its custody (i.e. lock him up), it has the obligation to protect that person, irrespective who he is and what he has done to deserve being locked up.
thanks for your expert opinion. are you running the state btw?
If you disagree with such a fundamental basic notion I have nothing to say to you.
put your thinking hat on. with limited resources and prisons overcrowding is not possible to baby sit each convict. the other day in national geographic they showed a documentary about the life of child rapists and molesters in a hi security us prison. it was good one....anyways in the case of faizal i am sure he would end up having his own single room and stuff and will have restricted access to other inmates, but still anything is possible. karma will catch up. And you can bet your ass there will be haters who hate the haters there, exactly how they showed the documentary in ng.
personally i dislike having the state spend millions of $'s on these convicts. i say take a quick shot to the head and be done with it. saves time and money.
personally i dislike having the state spend millions of $'s on these convicts. i say take a quick shot to the head and be done with it. saves time and money.
Don't you want to torture them first? That's what they did in the medieval age, the age that seems your natural habitat. All these silly developments since then, you know, human rights, denying states discretionary powers and such, they're such a waste.
Why would it be classified? you really are a moron.
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 2:11 am
_Master_
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711
berzerker wrote:
_Master_ wrote:
personally i dislike having the state spend millions of $'s on these convicts. i say take a quick shot to the head and be done with it. saves time and money.
Don't you want to torture them first?
sure if i ever got a chance, i would prepare a nice suite
berzerker wrote:
That's what they did in the medieval age, the age that seems your natural habitat. All these silly developments since then, you know, human rights, denying states discretionary powers and such, they're such a waste.
now now lets not get carried away in flights of passion. btw people fucked each other in the medieval age and they still do now. and for medieval people who go around blowing up others they need special medieval treatment.
_________________ follow me or get out of the way
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 2:12 am
_Master_
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711
also i am guessing that one of the people whom you know is in prison?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 6 of 12Goto page Previous1, 2, 3 ... 5, 6, 7 ... 10, 11, 12Next
