Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
Online
384 guest(s) and 0 member(s)
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
if it can work for you in some occasions, then it can very well for other users too.
Show me where it has worked for me. Please. Show me where it has worked for me in that context. I dare you.
I'll put this in my signature if I have to
Posted: Wed May 05, 2010 5:15 pm
FUCK_YOU_ALL
A Winner is me!
Joined: Feb 02, 2009
Posts: 630
Location: Why so serious? Seriously, why? It doesn't make sense.
Alez wrote:
_Master_ wrote:
lets face it, II-Duce has exposed Dr Shrink for a fake he is
Yes, some irrefutable evidence that was!
Well it's about satan praise time you all came to this conclusion, you slow minded, dim witted, constant bowel fluctuating, devolved, misguided, FUCKIES.
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 6:06 pm
_Master_
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711
Some pleasure news
"The only gunman captured alive after the 2008 Mumbai attacks has been sentenced to death by an Indian court
The attacks left 174 people dead, nine of them gunmen. Relations between India and Pakistan have still to recover.
Judge ML Tahaliyani said "he should be hanged by the neck until he is dead", adding he had lost his right to "humanitarian treatment". "
if it can work for you in some occasions, then it can very well for other users too.
Show me where it has worked for me. Please. Show me where it has worked for me in that context. I dare you.
I'll put this in my signature if I have to
hey did you change your signature?
_________________ follow me or get out of the way
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 6:58 am
berzerker
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350
I'm just reading this book about the world between 1890 and 1914. One chapter is about the anarchist movement which was quite widespread in the decades before 1914. Among them were quite a few terrorists: in the period the book is about they assassinated quite a few world leaders, the king of Italy, the presidents of France and the US, two prime minister of Spain, etc. I'd say they were more successful in assassinating top politicians than any present terrorist movement.
Their idea was to abolish all forms of property and government, in that situation all people would behave socially and reasonably. This is quite a silly notion, it would seem, so how come this movement got so much momentum, particularly since these are poor organisers (anarchists, what did you expect)?
It was simply the desperate situation of most common people at that time. Housing was bad, food was bad, pay was insufficient for making sure your kids could have a better future than you, all conditions were bad, you were being exploited by factory owners, and there was nothing you could do to make it better, and if you resorted to strikes, you found your own state against you, and you risked being shot by the police. They supported inequality and injustice rather than fight it, so they were your enemy and I for one can understand why in such a situation people would resort to terrorism.
I guess in such a situation most people are willing to accept just anything and anyone who promises them a better future. Now still this seems to be the fertile soil on which terrorism grows: desperation and hopelessness. Improve people's lives a bit and give them some freedom and hope and they have something to lose and are much less likely to become terrorists. The desperation as a breeding ground for terrorism could come from non-economic circumstances too of course, e.g. if you cannot possibly get any level of self-determination for your people and there is no hope at all for improvement (e.g. the situation only deteriorates) this will have the same effect.
BTW it was not only the poor itself who resorted to terrorism (mostly bombing, but assassinations were also carried out with pistols and knives) but also rich people who took the fate of the poor to heart.
This may be a lesson for the Israeli, who seem to act completely contradictory. In stead of giving Palestinians hope non-economically, they also take away what little they have left economically, which breeds even more terrorists.
Of course Suislide will not agree, because in his simple logic the only way to deal with terrorist is to kill them and Israel is beyond critisism anyway. I'd say it would make more sense to tackle the root of the problem rather than the symptoms.
Last edited by berzerker on Sun May 09, 2010 7:00 am, edited 2 times in total
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 8:55 am
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
_Master_ wrote:
Some pleasure news
"The only gunman captured alive after the 2008 Mumbai attacks has been sentenced to death by an Indian court
The attacks left 174 people dead, nine of them gunmen. Relations between India and Pakistan have still to recover.
Judge ML Tahaliyani said "he should be hanged by the neck until he is dead", adding he had lost his right to "humanitarian treatment". "
if it can work for you in some occasions, then it can very well for other users too.
Show me where it has worked for me. Please. Show me where it has worked for me in that context. I dare you.
I'll put this in my signature if I have to
hey did you change your signature?
It's too long. And I have come to the conclusion that you are insane
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 12:41 pm
craterface
Poopypants
Joined: Jun 26, 2009
Posts: 356
anarchy means more than chaos and destruction. it can be living while not being monitored. without any order or hierarchy or money. of course there's no guarantee that it will be peaceful, that's for sure, but at least we deffinetly know, that order guarantees wars. because each country has his own beliefs of what order means by their different laws and religion. not to mention wealth.
by anarchy there will be blood and sadness too, but only in small micro enviroments. there's no way that anybody can start a war for example during total anarchy, because nobody have to follow no one. everybody can live by their own idea of living. does that necessarily means chaos? or will it be the promise land that humans were to accomplish on earth?
it depends on the nature of humanity.
so that means anyone who's against anarchy does not believe in the good side of people? maybe his own?
well... kinda yes. or he's just too comfortable to give up internet and pizza delivery.
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 12:01 am
_Master_
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711
puk wrote:
_Master_ wrote:
puk wrote:
I'll put this in my signature if I have to
hey did you change your signature?
It's too long. And I have come to the conclusion that you are insane
i am insane because you said you would put it in your sig, but you didnt? seems to be the other way around.
_________________ follow me or get out of the way
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 12:06 am
_Master_
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711
berzerker wrote:
This may be a lesson for the Israeli, who seem to act completely contradictory..
Israelis are smart, they will simply reject these foolish lessons. these lessons belong to boring professors and dull personalities.
berzerker wrote:
In stead of giving Palestinians hope non-economically, they also take away what little they have left economically, which breeds even more terrorists.
BS. Palestinians are islamic, where there is islam and other cultures, there will always be problems, because Islamic culture is radical and savage. savagery must be dealt with more savagery, in fact it must be at least 2xsavagery. If Palestinians where Buddhists then middle east would be a peaceful place.
_________________ follow me or get out of the way
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 12:07 am
_Master_
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711
craterface wrote:
it depends on the nature of humanity.
now thats a well put out stamt, as a result of which i am sorry to say you dont belong at vgs.
Last edited by _Master_ on Sun May 09, 2010 12:15 am, edited 1 time in total _________________ follow me or get out of the way
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 12:12 am
_Master_
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 18, 2009
Posts: 1711
puk wrote:
I think you made a mistake, this does not appear to demonize the muslims.
look fool i dont have an issue with ignorant muslims, however the Islamic terrorist was sentenced to death and that makes my heart glow with the tremendous radiance of a red-giant about to go supernova.
_________________ follow me or get out of the way
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 3:53 am
berzerker
A Winner is me!
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
Posts: 2350
_Master_ wrote:
berzerker wrote:
In stead of giving Palestinians hope non-economically, they also take away what little they have left economically, which breeds even more terrorists.
BS. Palestinians are islamic, where there is islam and other cultures, there will always be problems, because Islamic culture is radical and savage.
Palestinians were not known to be extremists muslims, it is only Israels repressive and discriminatory policies combined with the corrupt PLO rule after the Oslo accords that make them extremists. Mind you, PLO is not religious at all, and they were the undisputed spokes persons of the Palestinians for decades (if there was competition, it was mainly left wings secular movements, not islamists), and if they had made the best of the (admittedly limited) opportunities they had after their return to Palestine, few people would have thought of resorting to Hamas. It is exactly like I said, if you are in a desperate situation you are willing to accept anything that promises you a way out, even religious fanatics. I guess this is the more the case if there is an adversary that has lots of religious fundamentalists itself.
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 9:17 am
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
_Master_ wrote:
puk wrote:
_Master_ wrote:
puk wrote:
I'll put this in my signature if I have to
hey did you change your signature?
It's too long. And I have come to the conclusion that you are insane
i am insane because you said you would put it in your sig, but you didnt? seems to be the other way around.
You're insane b/c you are hell bent on anhialating all Muslims.
Furthermore, your logic doesn't work there. Assuming, arguendo, that I claimed you were insane b/c I said I would put that quote in my sig but didn't, then that would make me illogical, not insane.
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 9:18 am
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
_Master_ wrote:
BS. Palestinians are islamic, where there is islam and other cultures, there will always be problems, because Islamic culture is radical and savage. savagery must be dealt with more savagery, in fact it must be at least 2xsavagery. If Palestinians where Buddhists then middle east would be a peaceful place.
Wow that was a mind fart!
Tibetans are buddhists, but there is no peace in Tibet.
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 9:20 am
puk
A Winner is me!
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 2140
Location: Southampton, UK
_Master_ wrote:
...i dont have an issue with ignorant muslims...
It doesn't sound like it here
_Master_ wrote:
BS. Palestinians are islamic, where there is islam and other cultures, there will always be problems, because Islamic culture is radical and savage...
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 10:15 am
craterface
Poopypants
Joined: Jun 26, 2009
Posts: 356
_Master_ wrote:
craterface wrote:
it depends on the nature of humanity.
now thats a well put out stamt, as a result of which i am sorry to say you dont belong at vgs.
this whole post considering islamic stuff does not belong to vgs. at least not in tis manner. it should be more like the fuck niggers-post, not like something out of the discovery channel.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 3 of 12Goto page Previous1, 2, 3, 4 ... 10, 11, 12Next
