Video Games Suck  
  Create an account
  
Menu
· Home
· Article Archive
· Downloads
· Forums
· Private Messages
· Screenshots
· Search
· Submit a Review
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Your Account
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
Online
204 guest(s) and
0 member(s)

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
Brothers In Arms
Posted on Tuesday, March 22 @ 20:07:58 EST by Suislide
FPS reviewsAnother fucking World War 2 shooter. Man they really like to get original now a days and think of new interesting things to make games about. Anyways its made by Gearbox who brought the massive hunk of shit Halo port to the PC.

Graphics: Ok if you think the graphics in this game are good you deserve to be smashed in the face in the shovel. Face the fucking facts the graphics are shit and look like a shitty console port OH WAIT IT IS! The foilage doesnt look bad which is good because it hards to do go good foilage. BUT WHAT THE FUCK. This game looks NOTHING like the fucking bullshit screenshots that they gave to us. That screenshot had SEXY HDR effects and high res textures and super sharp foilage. This game has decent foilage, the blurriest shittest ugliest textures anyone has ever seen. What the fuck is this Half-Life 1? Because thats exactly what the textures look like they are ripped from. Theres some slight bloom effects which arent bad and the character models are nothing special. The graphics in this game just look like pure fucking garbage. My friend took a shit and smashed it all over his chest and i was like WOW! Its Brother in Arms!


Sound: Ok so i start up the game to go and enable some 5.1 for some ass kicking sound. I go to the menu.. and WHAT THE FUCK? Theres only one bar there for adjusting the Volume level. Holy dog shit, who needs 5.1 audio or want to adjust the volume level of different things. EAX? PFfft throw that in the fucking garbage.. You kno whats funny is Wolfenstein 3D has more audio options then this game. The sound in the game isnt that bad though the gunshots and such. The only thing that is so dumb is the fucking dialouge. WHY DO ALL THESE GAMES HAVE TO HAVE FUCKING DIALOUG THAT SOUNDS LIKE BILL AND TED CAME STOPPED OFF THEIR EXCELLENT ADVENTURE AND WROTE THE SCRIPT. Jesus fucking christ learn to right some decent dialoug so i dont have to laugh at how stupid it sounds. Atleast the sounds for things are fairly good but no 5.1 support? PFFT


Gameplay: Ok so the gameplay i played, didnt start out to bad. Try to surpress the enemy and see if you can possibly flank around and get him from the side... sure that was cool and fairly original but there was one huge problem with it. YOU DO THE SAME FUCKING THING THE WHOLE GAME. Sweet i love surpressing an enemy then flanking around everytime i see him! I mean come on, retards like to do the same thing over and over so why shouldnt everyone else! Also theres one problem that pissed me off, even if you can see them looking out from their cover.. YOU CANT HIT THEM... no matter what you fucking do.. YOU HAVE TO flank. How awesome is that i mean, hell he is exposed! But you cant hit him because you didnt flank around! THATS FUN. If they fucking mixed up the gameplay a bit with other strategies it MIGHT BE OK! But no. There was cool level when you had the sniper and you were in the church because it wasnt the same thing anymore. Also this game isnt that long.. again.... cant anyone make a fucking game that takes me longer than 3 sittins to beat?


Story: You are in a group of lame soldiers, theres no character development, you just fight with the same people. Hell even if they die in the mission they come back so who needs feeling for them! They are invincible! There is hardly a story..just that you become squad leader and thats it.... WOOO

The game wasnt bad at first but got repetitive and atleast had some good sounds for the weapons and shit. But why the fuck did gamespy and IGN and give it a 9? Thats a fucking load of garbage THERE IS NO WAY IN HELL this game is a nine. ANYONE who fucking plays can realize its simply above average. Leave it so fucking Gameshit and IGN to blow ratings out of proportion 6.5/10

Related Links
· FPS reviews
· News by Suislide


Most read story in FPS reviews:
Half-Life 2

Article Rating
Average Score: 3.47
Votes: 38


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly  Printer Friendly

 Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend

Threshold
  
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

Re: Brothers In Arms (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 22 @ 21:21:30 EST
WWII games will span a longer life cycle then the actual war itself! (which lasted 6 years).

NO MORE FUCKING WAR GAMES YOU ASS HATS!


[ Reply to This ]


Re: Brothers In Arms (Score: 1)
by M0nKeY on Tuesday, March 22 @ 22:20:17 EST
(User Info | Send a Message)
Heres a review somone submitted anonymously and suislide didnt see it becase he had a dick in his eyes.

Brother's In Arms - Road to Hill 30

OK, Who THE FUCK SAID THAT THIS GAME IS REALISTIC? HE NEEDS A FUCKIN' REALITY CHECK! THIS GAME IS FUCKIN' RETARDED. WTF! READ ON!

Ok, CoD is a much damn better game than this shit. I can't believe I played it.

Graphics: So, damn game has HDR support. Big Fuckin' deal. THe game looks like crap. All environments are either gay green or shit brown. It's supposed to use a Unreal Engine, well, the goddamn CoD look better than this crap. Fuckin models look as if they were handcrafted from 3D rendering of shit. Guys are all pale as if they are already dead. Nazi's look like shit too, but they deserve it.

Sounds: Lot's of F-Words. Weapons sound good. Best point in the game. Some humor for retards too.

Gameplay. OK WTF IS THIS WRONG WITH THIS GAME? REALISTIC? MY ASS IN THE MORNING LOOKS MORE REALISTIC THAN THIS PILE OF WWII STYLED CRAP. First off, you can't kill people the normal way. The bullets won't do shit. You see, first u gotta shoot in general direction of the nazis in order to make a little red dot on their head turn grey. That means they are scared. WOW. Fuckin' realistic. Well, that red blob kinda gives away their position, don't ya think you bitches who made this game. Second, you can pause a game at any point, go in Observer mode, and view ur enemies and their locales. WOW. VERY FUCKIN smart. U CAN SEE GERMANS BEFORE THEY SEE YOU. WOW, I BET WWII SOLDIERS COULD DO THAT TOO! GAME IS SO DAMN LINEAR, that you can't go anywhere but straight and there is only one way of getting the germans. FLANK THEM! WOW. THey won't die unless u aim down the sight from their back or side. Otherwise, no matter how good ur aim is, the bullet won't hit the germans, even if he is standing up straight and lookin' at you. U can't kill people up front. U gotta sneak up on them. BTW, there is only one possible way for u to flank people, since the game is even more linear than the damn CoD. All enemies are spawning and scripted, and they always come in pairs. FUCKIN REALITY.

Instead of commanding a squad of 13, as advertised on box, u get maximum up to 2 people in ur direct command. All others are on "other" missions and they never die. Your squad can die but they resurrect next mission. VERY REALISTIC. EVEN DAMN CoD never showed dead people. FUCKIN' overrated games. Gayspot sucked the cock of this game once again. The said, best WWII game ever. YEAH RIGHT! WTF!

Story: You are band of 13 gaylord pussies and you're dropped in france to kick german ass. VERY ORIGINAL. VERY TRUE MOFO's. BUT NOT TOO MUCH FUN! THIS GAME IS SO NOT ORIGINAL IT MAKES ME WANNA PUKE AND SEND THAT PUKE TO TO GEARBOX for fuckin' reality check.

Verdict. GAME SUCKS ASS. LINEAR. BOORING. UNORIGINAL. UNREALISTIC. IF WWII WEAPONS SUCKED AS MUCH ASS AS THEY DO IN THIS GAME, SOLDIERS WERE MUCH BETTER OFF WITH SWORDs. Firefights take forever in this game.

2.5/10 (Call Of Duty is a much better game.) You are much better off killin germans on ur own than with this game and it's squad of 13 gay mofos.
If WWII was this booring, I bet it wouldnt have lasted as long as it did. Fuckin' shit.


[ Reply to This ]


Re: Brothers In Arms (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 23 @ 00:22:22 EST
Suislide, in order to enable 5.1 sound and EAX you have to go to the main game's folder and edit some files. I know it's fucked up, and u still see all the xbox commands and files in that folder.

Fuckin' Germcox, (aka Gearbox), they lifted the damn game straight outta xbox, didn't even bother to adjust and clean it up. Lazy pussies. Piece of shit.


[ Reply to This ]


Re: Brothers In Arms (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Thursday, March 24 @ 06:00:56 EST
Oh fuck, this is shit. I've wanted to buy this game, but now I have to consider, that this game is like the other WWII Games; totally boring and surely includes not even a piece of a good graphic.
bah, thank you, now I wait until F.E.A.R releases


[ Reply to This ]


Re: Brothers In Arms (Score: 1)
by GothicLord13 on Thursday, March 24 @ 19:07:21 EST
(User Info | Send a Message)
Are you guys sane?


[ Reply to This ]


Re: Brothers In Arms (Score: 1)
by Grumpy_Boy on Tuesday, March 29 @ 12:54:10 EST
(User Info | Send a Message)
"My friend took a shit and smashed it all over his chest and i was like WOW! Its Brother in Arms!"

mmm er does Monkey do this with you or is it a diffrent friend do you take turns doing this?

Any good review nice rant level you really seemed to hate it quite a lot.

What sucker stills plays war games, war games are sad any way, mainly played by little gay boys who touch them selves at night dreaming of solders.


[ Reply to This ]


Re: Brothers In Arms (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Friday, April 29 @ 23:17:08 EDT
Hey the game is truly based on the real story. If it is not go and put your fucking scene in the story.


[ Reply to This ]


Re: Brothers In Arms (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Monday, June 06 @ 16:29:37 EDT
yea, I rather spend my evening on a stepladder in no-mansland smoking endless cigarettes through an illumius barrakada.

rowan atkinson-Blackadder goes forth.

when will they try a game about WW I, surely there is something to do about that?


[ Reply to This ]


Re: Brothers In Arms (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Monday, June 06 @ 16:31:22 EDT
btw, call of duty, metal of honor are also based on real stories, real people.

they just don't show it off as much.


[ Reply to This ]


Re: Brothers In Arms (Score: 1)
by Kalafan on Thursday, April 27 @ 05:33:43 EDT
(User Info | Send a Message)
We gotta kill fuckin' Randy Pitchford and Col. John Antal because they overhyped a fucking game! My rifle sights fucking shake too much when I aim, but they don't really shake like that in real life, ESPECIALLY not when there's machineguns and mortars goin' off like crazy around me! I mean, it's not like guns have WEIGHT to them or anything, you know?!? And flanking??? More like FUCKING!!! I should be able to kill a small platoon of Germans head on with little more than a few minor scrapes and bruises, just like REAL AMERICAN SOLDIERS did during the war!!! FUCKERS OUGHT TO AT LEAST DO A PACIFIC THEATER EXPANSION SO WE CAN USE A FLAMETHROWER ON NIPS HIDING IN A CAVE WHILE OUR BUDDIES RAPE THEIR WIVES AND DAUGHTERS IN THE BACKGROUND.


[ Reply to This ]

Video Games Screenshots Movies Images Reviews News New Video Game Sucks VGS Online
Logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owner. Comments are property of their posters, the rest is ©VGS
Page Generation: 0.082 Seconds